Pros and Cons of Laissez Faire

0
32385
Pros and Cons of Laissez Faire

Laissez Faire leadership occurs when a government decides to entrust their decision making to their followers. This leadership style is much more hands off than most forms of government and allows the people to take a more active role in their governing. Supporters believe that this form of government is great for encouraging people who would not typically be involved to take on a larger role, while detractors see it as a route to reduced productivity. In order to learn more, let’s take a closer look at the pros and cons of Laissez Faire leadership.

List of Pros of Laissez Faire

1. Encourages Those Who Are Self Motivated
This form of government is great for people who can self motivate and do not need to be told what to do every step of the way. Laissez faire empowers those who are capable of working on their own. If a person has a strong internal motor and thrives when they are left to their devices, this style of governing works for them.

2. Increased Satisfaction With Work
When a person is able to take the initiative to complete tasks on their own, this leads to an increased level of satisfaction with the work that they have completed. Laissez faire gives citizens the tools they need to take matters into their own hands and complete tasks in a timely manner.

3. Leaders Are Still Crucial
While a laissez faire approach tends to mean that the leaders are very hands off, this does not mean that they are not still available for consultation should the people need to speak with them. Instead of making cumbersome rules, leaders attempt to offer helpful advice.

List of Cons of Laissez Faire

1. People Lack Knowledge
Ambition, talent, self motivation, all of these factors are helpful, but they are no substitute for knowledge. Completing tasks properly and being able to make the correct decisions is a job that is typically best left to the government.

2. Everyone Is Not Self Motivated
There is a reason why most countries rely on democratic forms of government: most people lack reliable self motivation. Unless they are pointed in a certain direction, they do not always know which way to go. Having a stable government body helps to ease worried minds and keeps people on the right track.

3. Minimal Cohesiveness
When a leader does not have direct involvement with the decisions that are made, this can lead to a severe lack of cohesiveness. When the people are the ones who are responsible for making decisions, it is incredibly difficult to come to a consensus. Everyone has their own thoughts and ideas, which leads to an inability to come together and do what is best for the majority.